To What Extent Might the Methodology of School Inspection Affect the Fairness and Accuracy of the Process?

Authors

  • Meiyao Lu Weston Education Centre, King’s College London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/ret.v1i4.336

Abstract

Education is to learn or to gain knowledge of something through being taught by others or through self-learning. The two most important words about education are teaching and learning. By definition, teachers are leaders, and to put it simply leaders lead. Teachers lead their students along the path of knowledge. As for students, they who can be equipped with academic knowledge and a set of practical skills can be useful members of society and make a contribution to the economic development of a nation and even the world. In this sense, we should keep in mind that to consistently improve the quality of education is to promise a bright future for the nation.

Keywords:

Extent, Methodology, School inspection, Fairness, Accuracy

References

[1] Holmes, E., 2008. FAQs for school inspection: Practical advice and working solutions. Routledge.

[2] Ouston, J., Earley, P. and Fidler, B. eds., 1996. OFSTED Inspections: the early experience. David Fulton Pub.

[3] Baxter, J. and Clarke, J., 2013. Farewell to the tick box inspector? —— Ofsted and the changing regime of school inspection in England. Oxford Review of Education, 39(5), pp.702-718.

[4] Wilcox, B., 2000. Making school inspection visits more effective: The English experience. UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.

[5] Brimblecombe, N., Ormston, M. and Shaw, M., 1995. Teachers’ perceptions of school inspection: A stressful experience. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25(1), pp.53-61.

[6] Orlik, S. and Woods, D., 2013. School review and inspection. Routledge.

[7] Maw, J., 1995. The Handbook for the Inspection of Schools: a critique. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25(1), pp.75-87.

[8] Winch, C., 2001. Towards a non-punitive school inspection régime. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(4), pp.683-694.

[9] Courtney, S.J., 2016. Post-panopticism and school inspection in England. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(4), pp.623–642.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 1 , Iss. 4 (October 2018)

Article Type

Research Article

License

Copyright and Licensing

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

Review of Educational Theory publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by Review of Educational Theory agree to have the CC BY-NC 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for non-commercial use. As long as you follow the license terms and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material.

License Policy for Reuse of Third-Party Materials

If a manuscript submitted to the journal contains the materials which are held in copyright by a third-party, authors are responsible for obtaining permissions from the copyright holder to reuse or republish any previously published figures, illustrations, charts, tables, photographs, and text excerpts, etc. When submitting a manuscript, official written proof of permission must be provided and clearly stated in the cover letter.
The editorial office of the journal has the right to reject/retract articles that reuse third-party materials without permission.

Journal Policies on Data Sharing

We encourage authors to share articles published in our journal to other data platforms, but only if it is noted that it has been published in this journal.