Stream Monitoring and Preliminary Co-Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage and Municipal Wastewater along Dunkard Creek Area

Authors

  • Dongyang Deng Built Environment, Center of Excellence in Product Design and Advanced Manufacturing (CEPDAM), North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
  • Lian-shin Lin Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6103, USA
  • Andrea Nana Ofori-Boadu Department of Built Environment, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, 27411, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/hsme.v2i2.2448

Abstract

This study investigated coal-mine drainage (AMD) and municipal wastewater (MWW) contaminant concentrations and conducted the combined treatment in phases I and II: phase I, evaluating the effects of mixing the two based on the extent of acid neutralization and metals removal; phase II: conducting anaerobic batch reactor treatment of AMD and MWW under varying COD/sulfate ratios (0.04-5.0). In phase I, acid mine drainage water quality conditions are as follows: pH 4.5, acidity 467.5 mg/L as CaCO3, alkalinity 96.0 mg/L as CaCO3, Cl- 11.8 mg/L, SO4 2- 1722 mg/L, TDS 2757.5 mg/L, TSS 9.8 mg/L, BOD 14.7 mg/L, Fe 138.1 mg/L, Mg 110.8 mg/L. Mn 7.5 mg/L, Al 8.1 mg/L, Na 114.2 mg/L, and Ca 233.5 mg/L. Results of the mixing experiments indicated significant removal of selected metals (Fe 85~98%, Mg 0~65%, Mn 63~89%, Al 98~99%, Na 0~30%), acidity (77~95%) from the mine water and pH was raised to above 6.3. The Phase II results suggested under the wide range of COD/ sulfate ratios, COD and sulfate removal varied from 37.4%-100% and 0%-93.5% respectively. During biological treatment, alkalinity was generated which leads to pH increase to around 7.6-8.5. The results suggested feasibility of the proposed technology for co-treatment of AMD and MWW. A conceptual design of co-treatment system which is expected to remove a matrix of pollutants has been provided to utilize all the locally available water resources to achieve the optimum treatment efficiency. The technology also offers an opportunity to significantly reduce capital and operating costs compared to the existing treatment methodologies used. Featured Application: In this study, we have measured the concentrations of contaminants in acid mine drainage (AMD) and municipal wastewater (MWW) and conducted the combined treatment in phases I and II. This is significant because in previous years there was a massive fish kill that is linked to the high total dissolved solids (TDS) and salinity content in the water. With the current proposed combined treatment technology, it shows high potential in reducing TDS and salinity content in the combined wastewater which will prevent similar accident (Dunkard creek fish kill in 2019) happening again.

Keywords:

Combined treatment, Mixing Experiments, Anaerobic batch reactor treatment

References

[1] Blowes, D., Ptacek, C., Jambor, J., Weisener, C.,Paktunc, D., Gould, W., Johnson, D. J. E. g. The geochemistry of acid mine drainage. 2003, 9: 149-204.

[2] Johnson, D. B., Hallberg, K. B. J. S. o. t. t. e. Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review, 2005, 338:3-14.

[3] Mining, O. o. S. Office of Surface Mining Annual Report: 2006. . Report No. Report No.: Washington, D.C., USA: U.S. Department of Interior, 2006.

[4] Sengupta, M. Environmental impacts of mining monitoring, restoration, and control. CRC Press, 1993.

[5] Neculita, C. M., Zagury, G. J., Bussière, B. J. J. o. E. Q. Passive treatment of acid mine drainage in bioreactors using sulfate-reducing bacteria: Critical review and research needs. 2007, 36: 1-16.

[6] Lewis, A. E. J. H. Review of metal sulphide precipitation, 2010, 104: 222-234.

[7] Waybrant, K., Blowes, D., Ptacek, C. J. E. S. Technology. Selection of reactive mixtures for use in permeable reactive walls for treatment of mine drainage. 1998, 32: 1972-1979.

[8] Benner, S., Blowes, D., Ptacek, C., Mayer, K. J. A. G. Rates of sulfate reduction and metal sulfide precipitation in a permeable reactive barrier, 2002, 17: 301- 320.

[9] Dvorak, D. H., Hedin, R. S., Edenborn, H. M., McIntire, P. E. J. B., bioengineering. Treatment of metal-contaminated water using bacterial sulfate reduction: Results from pilot-scale reactors, 1992, 40: 609-616.

[10] Johnson, K. L., Younger, P. L. J. E. G. The co-treatment of sewage and mine waters in aerobic wetlands, 2006, 85: 53-61.

[11] Jong, T., Parry, D. L. J. W. r. Removal of sulfate and heavy metals by sulfate reducing bacteria in shortterm bench scale upflow anaerobic packed bed reactor runs. 2003, 37: 3379-3389.

[12] Strosnider, W., Winfrey, B., Nairn, R. J. M. W., Environment, t. Alkalinity generation in a novel multistage high-strength acid mine drainage and municipal wastewater passive co-treatment system. 2011, 30: 47-53.

[13] Tuttle, J. H., Dugan, P. R., Randles, C. I. J. A. M. Microbial sulfate reduction and its potential utility as an acid mine water pollution abatement procedure. 1969, 17: 297-302.

[14] Strosnider, W., Winfrey, B., Nairn, R. J. w. r. Biochemical oxygen demand and nutrient processing in a novel multi-stage raw municipal wastewater and acid mine drainage passive co-treatment system. 2011, 45: 1079-1086.

[15] Skousen, J., Rose, A., Geidel, G., Foreman, J., Evans, R., Hellier, W. Handbook of technologies for avoidance and remediation of acid mine drainage. National Mine Land Reclamation Center, Morgantown, 1998, 131.

[16] Chang, I. S., Shin, P. K., Kim, B. H. J. W. r. Biological treatment of acid mine drainage under sulphate-reducing conditions with solid waste materials as substrate. 2000, 34: 1269-1277.

[17] Henze, M., van Loosdrecht, M. C., Ekama, G. A., Brdjanovic, D. Biological wastewater treatment. IWA publishing, 2008.

[18] Metcalf, L., Eddy, H. Wastewater engineering–treatment and reuse, 4th edn. Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003.

[19] Mannino, I., Franco, D., Piccioni, E., Favero, L., Mattiuzzo, E., Zanetto, G. J. E. M. A cost-effectiveness analysis of seminatural wetlands and activated sludge wastewater-treatment systems, 2008, 41: 118- 129. [20] Muga, H. E., Mihelcic, J. R. J. J. o. e. m. Sustainability of wastewater treatment technologies, 2008, 88: 437-447.

[20] Martin M., A. G. Energy audits of WWTPs. Report No. Report No.: Internal reports Suez Environment, 2011.

[21] Cooper, N. B., Marshall, J. W., Hunt, K., Reidy, J. G. J. W. e., technology. Less power, great performance, 2007, 19: 63-66.

[22] Omoike, A. J. W. R. Removal of phosphorus and organic matter removal by alum during wastewater treatment, 1999, 33: 3617-3627.

[23] Jarvis, L. J. C. M. R. PAC Faces Renewed Pressure From Tight Supplies, Rising Costs. 2000, 257: 29-29.

[24] Ouellette, J. J. C. M. R. Coagulants and flocculants rise, 1996, 250, SR18-SR18.

[25] Menezes, J., Silva, R., Arce, I., Schneider, I. J. M. E. Production of a poly-alumino-iron sulphate coagulant by chemical precipitation of a coal mining acid drainage, 2010, 23: 249-251.

[26] Kaksonen, A. H., Puhakka, J. J. E. i. L. S. Sulfate reduction based bioprocesses for the treatment of acid mine drainage and the recovery of metals, 2007, 7: 541-564.

[27] Roetman, E. T. The sterilization of sewage by acid mine water. West Virginia University, 1932.

[28] Joseph, J. M., Shay, D. E. J. A. J. o. P. H.; Health, t. N. Viability of Escherichia coli in acid mine waters,1952, 42: 795-800.

[29] Rogers, T. O., Wilson, H. J. J. PH as a selecting mechanism of the microbial flora in wastewater-polluted acid mine drainage, 1966: 990-995. [31] Eaton, A. D., Clesceri, L. S., Greenberg, A. E., Franson, M. A. H. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American public health association, 2005, 21: 1600.

[30] Kumar, N., Omoregie, E. O., Rose, J., Masion, A., Lloyd, J. R., Diels, L., Bastiaens, L. J. W. R. Inhibition of sulfate reducing bacteria in aquifer sediment by iron nanoparticles. 2014, 51: 64-72.

[31] Deng, D., Lin, L.-S. J. W. r. Continuous sulfidogenic wastewater treatment with iron sulfide sludge oxidation and recycle. 2017, 114: 210-217.

[32] Deng, D., Weidhaas, J. L., Lin, L.-S. J. J. o. H. m. Kinetics and microbial ecology of batch sulfidogenic bioreactors for co-treatment of municipal wastewater and acid mine drainage. 2016, 305: 200-208.

[33] Dar, S. A., Bijmans, M. F., Dinkla, I. J., Geurkink, B., Lens, P. N., Dopson, M. J. M. e. Population dynamics of a single-stage sulfidogenic bioreactor treating synthetic zinc-containing waste streams. 2009, 58: 529.

[34] Younger, P. L., Banwart, S. A., Hedin, R. S. Mine water: hydrology, pollution, remediation. Springer Science & Business Media, 2002.

[35] Kadlec, R., Wallace, S. J. B. R., London, New York. Treatment wetlands. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group. 2009: 267-347.

Downloads

Issue

Article Type

Articles