Investigation Responses of the Diagrid Structural System of High-rise Buildings Equipped with Tuned Mass Damper Using New Dynamic Method

Arash Karimipour (Department of Civil Engineering at Texas University)
Mansour Ghalehnovi (Associate Professor at Department of Civil engineering at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)
Mahmoud Edalati (Assistant Professor, Department of Civil engineering at Ilam University)
Mehdi Barani (Department of Civil Engineering at Ilam University)

Article ID: 2580

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jbms.v1i2.2580

Abstract


Due to the shortage of land in cities and population growth, the significance of high rise buildings has risen. Controlling lateral displacement of structures under different loading such as an earthquake is an important issue for designers. One of the best systems is the diagrid method which is built with diagonal elements with no columns for manufacturing tall buildings. In this study, the effect of the distribution of the tuned mass damper (TMD) on the structural responses of diagrid tall buildings was investigated using a new dynamic method. So, a diagrid structural systems with variable height with TMDs was solved as an example of structure. The reason for the selection of the diagrid system was the formation of a stiffness matrix for the diagonal and angular elements. Therefore, the effect of TMDs distribution on the story drift, base shear and structural behaviour were studied. The obtained outcomes showed that the TMDs distribution does not significantly affect on improving the behaviour of the diagrid structural system during an earthquake. Furthermore, the new dynamic scheme represented in this study has good performance for analyzing different systems. 


Keywords


Base shear;Diagrid structural system;Dynamic methods;Story drift;The tuned mass damper;Tall building

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] J.J. Connor. An introduction to structural motion control. IT University Press. 2001.

[2] H. Fraham. Device for damping vibration of bodies. us patent #989958. 1909

[3] R.J. Ormond, J.P. Den Hartog. The theory of dynamic vibration absorber. Trans. ASME.APM. 1982.

[4] R.E.D. Bishop, D.B. Welbourn. The Problem of the Dynamic Vibration Absorber: Engineer.Lond. J. Mech. Engng. Sci, 1952. Vol. 50, pp.174, 769.

[5] J.P. Den Hartog. Mechanical Vibration. McGraw-Hill. New York. 1956.

[6] K.C. Falcon, B.J. Stone, W.D. Simcock, C. Andrew. Optimization of vibration absorbers: a graphical method for use on idealized systems with restricted damping. J. Mech. Engng. Sci, 1967, Vol. 9, pp. 374-381.

[7] N.R. Petersen. Design of large-scale Tuned Mass Dampers. ASCE convention and Exposition, Boston, Mass, U. S. A. 1979.

[8] J.R. Sladek, R.E. Klingner. Using Tuned Mass Dampers to Reduce Seismic Response. Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey. 1980.

[9] S.E. Randall, D.M. Halsted, D.L. Taylor. Optimum Vibration absorbers for linear damped systems. J. Mech. Des. ASME. 1981. Vol. 13, pp. 154-183.

[10] G.B. Warburton. Optimum absorbers parameters for minimizing vibration response Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam. 1981. Vol. 10, pp. 54-73.

[11] Z. Shu, S. Li, X. Sun, M. He. Performance-based Seismic Design of a Pendulum Tuned Mass Damper System. Engineering Accepted author version posted online, 2017. Vol. 56. pp. 35-67.

[12] C. Li, Y. Liu. Ground motion dominant frequent effect on the design of multiple tuned mass dampers. Engineering Published online. 2008. Vol. 48. pp. 48-82.

[13] Q. Wu, J. Dai, H. Zhu. Optimum Design of Passive Control Devices for Reducing the Seismic Response of Twin-Tower-Connected Structures. Engineering Published online. 2017. Vol. 31, pp. 154-186.

[14] T. Engle, H. Mahmoud, A. Chulahwat. Hybrid Tuned Mass Damper and Isolation Floor Slab System Optimized for Vibration Control. Engineering Published online, 2015. Vol. 26, pp. 252-273.

[15] G. Bekdas, S. Melih, A. Nigdeli. Mass ratio factor for optimum tuned mass damper strategies. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2013. Vol. 142, pp.248-263.

[16] J. Morison, D. Karnopp. (1973) “Comparison of optimized active and passive vibration absorber. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Joint Automatic Control Conference, Columbus, OH, 1973. pp. 932–938.

[17] R.A. Lund. Active damping of large structures in winds, in H.H.E. Leipholz (Ed.), Structural Control. North Holland, New York. 1980.

[18] J. Chang, T.T. Soong. Structural control using active tuned mass dampers. American Society of Civil Engineers Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division. 1980. Vol. 106. pp. 1081–1088.

[19] F.E. Udwadia, S. Tabaie. Pulse control of the single degree of freedom system, American Society of Civil Engineers Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division. 1981. Vol. 107. pp. 997–1009.

[20] D. Hrovat, P. Barak, M. Rabins. Semi-active versus passive or active tuned mass dampers for structural control. American Society of Civil Engineers Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, 1983. Vol. 109. pp. 691–705.

[21] M. Abe. Semi-active tuned mass dampers for seismic protection of civil structures, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996. Vol. 25, pp. 743–749.

[22] J.P. Moehle. Displacement-based design of RC structures subjected to earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 1992. Vol. 8, pp. 403-438.

[23] C.A. Kircher. Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings: Seismic isolation and energy dissipation applications with existing buildings. Proceedings of the 15th structures Congress, Part 2, Portland, OR, USA, 1997. pp. 1234-1238.

[24] M. Mehrain, H. Krawinkler. Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings: New analysis procedures developed specifically for application with existing buildings. Proceedings of the 15th structures Congress, Part 2, Portland, OR, USA, 1997. pp. 1229-1233.

[25] D. Shapiro, C. Rojahn, L.D. Reaveley, W.T. Holmes, J.P. Moehle. Guidelines for seismic rehabilitation of buildings: An overview of the background approach and contents. Portland, OR, USA, 1996. pp. 1224-1228.

[26] B.A. Bolt. Discussion of Enduring lessons and opportunities lost from the San Fernando earthquake of February 9, 1971' by Paul C. Jennings. Earthquake Spectra, 1997. Vol.13, pp. 545-547.

[27] A. Frankel, C. Mueller, D. Perkins, T. Barnhard, E. Leyendecker, E. Safak, S. Hanson, N. Dickman, M. Hopper. New USGS seismic hazard maps for the United States. Proceedings of the Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction, Washington, DC, USA, 1996. pp. 173-174.

[28] K.R. Mackie, B. Stojadinovic. Four way: Graphical Tool for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2006. Vol.132, pp.1274-1283.

[29] G. Chen C. Chen, F.Y. Cheng. Soil-structure interaction effect on active control of multi-story buildings under earthquake loads. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2000. Vol. 10, pp. 517-532.

[30] G. Chen, J. Wu, C. Chen, M. Lou. Recent development in structural control including soil-structure interaction effect. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2000. Vol. 398, pp.229-242.

[31] I. Takewaki. Closed-form sensitivity of earthquake input energy to soil structure interaction system. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2007. Vol. 133, pp. 389-399.

[32] I. Takewaki, H. Fujimoto. Earthquake input energy to soil-structure interaction systems: A frequency-domain approach. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2004. Vol. 7, pp. 399-414.

[33] J.C. Wu, M.H. Shih, Y.Y. Lin, Y.C. Shen. Y. C. Design guidelines for tuned liquid column damper for structures responding to wind. Engineering Structures, 2005. Vol. 27, pp.1893-1905.

[34] W.H. Wu. Equivalent fixed-base models for soil-structure interaction systems. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1997. Vol. 16, pp. 323-336.

[35] W.H. Wu, C.Y. Chen. Simplified soil-structure interaction analysis using efficient lumped-parameter models for soil. Soils and Foundations, 2002. Vol. 42, pp. 41-52.

[36] W.H. Wu, H.A. Smith. Soil-structure interaction effects for internally controlled systems. Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA, 1993. 371-379.

[37] W.H. Wu, H.A. Smith. Efficient modal analysis for structures with soil-structure interaction. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1995. Vol. 24, pp. 283-299.

[38] J.G. Chase, G.W. Wodgers, K.J. Mulligan, J.B. Mander, R.P. Dhakal. Probabilistic Analysis and Non-Linear Semi-Active Base Isolation Spectra for Aseismic Design. 8th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2007. Singapore.

[39] G.W. Housner, L.A. Bergman, T.K. Caughey, A.G. Chassiakos, R.O. Claus, S.F. Masri, R.E. Skelton, T.T. Soong, B.E. Spencer, and J.T.P. Yao. Structural Control: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1997. Vol. 123, pp. 897-971.

[40] S.J. Hunt. Semi-active smart-dampers and resettable actuators for multi-level seismic hazard mitigation of steel moment resisting frames. ME Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. 2002.

[41] K. Mulligan, J. Chase, A. Gue, T. Alnot, G. Rodgers, J. Mander, R. Elliott, B. Deam, L. Cleeve, and D. Heaton. Large Scale Resettable Devices for Multi-Level Seismic Hazard Mitigation of Structures. Proc. 9th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR), Rome, Italy. 2005.

[42] K. Mulligan, J.G. Chase, J.B. Mander, M. Fougere, B.L. Deam, G. Danton, R.B. Elliott. Hybrid experimental analysis of semi-active rocking wall systems. Proc New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering Conference (NZSEE), Napier, New Zealand. 2006.

[43] G.W. Rodgers, J.G. Chase, J.B. Mander, N.C. Leach, C.S. Denmead. Experimental development, tradeoff analysis and design implementation of high force-to-volume damping technology. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 2007. Vol. 40, pp.35-48.

[44] T.T. Soong, B.F.J. Spencer. Active, semi-active and hybrid control of structures. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 2000. Vol. 33, pp. 387-402.

[45] T. Annaka, H. Yashiro. Uncertainties in a probabilistic model for seismic hazard analysis in Japan. Bologna, Italy, 2000. Vol. 57, pp. 369-378.

[46] A. Refice, D. Capolongo. Probabilistic modelling of uncertainties in earthquake-induced landslide hazard assessment. Computers and Geosciences, 2002. Vol. 28, pp.735-749.

[47] A.Y.I. Nishitani. Overview of the application of active/semiactive control to building structures in Japan. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2001. Vol. 30, pp. 1565-1574.

[48] I. Nagashima, R. Maseki, Y. Asami, J. Hirai, H. Abiru. Performance of hybrid mass damper system applied to a 36-storey high-rise building. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2001. Vol. 30, pp. 1615-1637.

[49] R.I. Skinner, W. H. Robinson, G.H. McVerry. An Introduction to Seismic Isolation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 1993.

[50] F. Ricciardelli, A.D. Pizzimenti, M. Mattei. M. Passive and active mass damper control of the response of tall buildings to wind gustiness. Engineering Structures, 2003. Vol. 25, pp. 1199-1209.

[51] M. Watakabe, M. Tohdo, O. Chiba, N. Izumi, H. Ebisawa, T. Fujita. Response control performance of a hybrid mass damper applied to a tall building. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2001. Vol. 30, 16551676.

[52] J.N. Yang, A.K. Agrawal. Semi-active hybrid control systems for nonlinear buildings against near-field earthquakes. Engineering Structures, 2002. Vol. 24, pp. 271-280.

[53] J.G. Chase, K.J. Mulligan, A. Gue, T. Alnot, G. Rodgers, J.B. Mander, R. Elliott, B. Deam, L. Cleeve, D. Heaton. Re-shaping hysteretic behaviour using semi-active resettable device dampers. Engineering Structures, 2006. Vol. 28, pp.1418-1429.

[54] M.Q. Feng. Innovative base isolation system for buildings. Proceedings of the Symposium on Structural Engineering in Natural Hazards Mitigation, Irvine, CA, USA, 1993. pp. 772-776.

[55] M.Q. Feng, M. Shinozuka. Friction controllable bearings for sliding base isolation systems. Proceedings of the 24th Joint Meetings on Wind and Seismic Effects. Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1992. pp. 189-198.

[56] M. Rezaiee-Pajand, A. Karimipour. Three stress-based triangular elements. Engineering with Computers. 2019. 765. 1-21.

[57] A. Kareem, S. Klein performance of multiple tuned mass dampers under random loadings. Journal of structural engineering, ASCE, 1995. Vol. 121, pp. 348-361.

[58] G. Ramadhan. Seismic performance of Diagrid Steel structures using single and Double Friction Mass Dampers. Orgon State University- Commencement June. 2014.

[59] E. Asadi, H. Adeli Diagrid: An innovative, sustainable, and efficient structural system. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 2017, Vol. 8, Issue 8. e1358.

[60] J. Kim, J. Kong Progressive collapse behavior of rotor‐type diagrid buildings. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 2013, Vol. 22, Issue. 16. pp. 1199-1214.

[61] E. Mele, M. Toreno, G. Brandonisio, A De Luca Diagrid structures for tall buildings: case studies and design considerations. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 2014. Vol. 23, Issue. 2, pp. 124-145.

[62] G. M. Montuori, E. Mele, G. Brandonisio, A De Luca, Design criteria for diagrid tall buildings: Stiffness versus strength. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 2014. Vol. 23, Issue. 17, pp. 1294-1314.

[63] G. Angelucci, F. Mollaioli , Diagrid structural systems for tall buildings: Changing pattern configuration through topological assessments. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 2017. Vol. 26, Issue. 18, e1396.

[64] R.W. Clough, J. Penzien. Dynamics of structures. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Book Company. 1993.

[65] G.C. Hart, K. Wong. Structural dynamics for structural engineering. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.1999.

[66] A. K. Chopra. Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 2nded. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 2001.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2021 Arash Karimipour, Mansour Ghalehnovi, Mahmoud Edalati, Mehdi Barani


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.