Evaluation of Germplasm of Pearl Millet (Penissetum glaucum L.) for Agronomic, Physiological and Biochemical Traits under Semi-arid Conditions of Hamelmalo

Authors

  • Habteslase Teklu Tesfagiorgis Department of Agronomy, Hamelmalo Agricultural College, Keren, Eritrea
  • Woldeamlak Araia Department of Agronomy, Hamelmalo Agricultural College, Keren, Eritrea
  • N. N. Angiras Department of Agronomy, Hamelmalo Agricultural College, Keren, Eritrea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jbr.v3i3.3319

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of Hamelmalo Agricultural College during summer 2017, to evaluate the agronomic, physiological, and biochemical performance of the collected Eritrean germplasm of pearl millet. A total of 16 accessions were tested, out of which 2 were improved varieties included as a check. The experiment was laid out in 4 x 4 Simple Lattice Design with Randomized Block using 4 replications with a gross plot size of 3.0 m x 1.2 m, row to row spacing of 75 cm and plant to plant spacing of 30 cm. The data collected were Agronomic parameters (growth, development, yield, and yield contributing characters); Physiological parameters (Relative water content and Water Use Efficiency); and Biochemical parameters (crude fat, crude fiber, protein content, TSS, and ash content). The data were analyzed using GENSTAT software and correlation analysis was worked to see the positive and negative contribution of agronomic, physiological, and biochemical attributes. The results of the study showed that Bariyay908 and Kona being statistically at par with Bariyay 910, Hagaz, Zibedi, Shleti, Delkata, Tokroray, and Kunama produced significantly higher grain yield. However, among these Baryay908 because of its superior agronomic characteristics, lower incidence of downy mildew, relatively higher water use efficiency and higher crude protein content were found to be comparatively superior to the check improved varieties Kona and Hagaz. Grain yield has shown a positive and significant correlation with harvest index, number of seeds per panicle, panicle length, leaf area and water use efficiency. These promising accessions need to be further tested for future breeding programs to develop varieties higher in productivity and resistant to downy mildew under semiarid conditions of Eritrea.

Keywords:

Pearl millet, Germplasm, Agronomic characters, Physiological characters, Biochemical characters

References

[1] FAO and ICRISAT. (1996), The world sorghum and millet economies: Facts, trends and outlook.A jointstudy by the Basic Foodstuffs Service International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.

[2] Millet-Everything. (2003), http://everything2.com/title/Millet accessed on 26th May 2017.

[3] Nouri, M., J. L Drew, C. M., Stephen, D. G. Tom and H. Rob. (2003), Pearl Millet and Grain Sorghum Yield Response to Water Supply in Nebraska. Alternative crops. Agronomy Journal. 95(6):1618-1624.

[4] Paterson, A. H., J. E. Bowers, and F. A. Feltus. (2008), Genomics of sorghum, a semi-arid cereal and emerging model for tropical grass genomics. In: Genomics of Tropical Crop Plants. pp. 469-482. (Paul H. and Moore R. eds). Springer Science Business Media, New York, USA.

[5] MoA. (2014), Ministry of Agriculture, Asmara, Eritrea.

[6] MoA. (2015), Crop Production. Ministry of Agriculture Zoba Anseba Annual Progress Keren, Eritrea.

[7] Hamelmalo Agriculural College. (2014), Hamelmalo Meteorological station. Hamelmalo, Eritrea.

[8] Stickler, F.C., A.W. Pouli, and A. Paul. (1961), Leaf area determination in grain sorghum. Agron. J. 53:188- 198.

[9] Jidda, M.B. and A. B. Anaso. (2017), Effects of crop improvement technologies on downy mildew of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.). Department of Crop Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria. Article Number: B066FCA63378 ISSN 2141-6591.

[10] Naeem, M. A., R.A Kainth , M. S. M. Chohhan and A.H. Khan. (2005), Comparison of pearl millet Pennisetum americanum, varieties for fodder yield. Journal of Agriculture Resources 43(3): 183-187.

[11] Vinodhana, K. N. , P. Sumathi and M.Sathya. (2013), Gnetic variability and inter-relationship among morpho-economic traits of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.,) and their implication in selection. https://www.ijpaes.com (accessed in July 2017).

[12] Imran, M., A. Bakhsh, S. Khan, A. Husain, Z.A. Gurmani and M. Qasim. (2007), Forage yield and quality potential of dual type pearl millet varieties under rain fed conditions of NARC. Islamabad. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Resources 20:137-141.

[13] National Agricultural Institute. (2005), Annual Pearl Millet Improvement Programme. Ministry of Agriculture, Asmara, Eritrea.

[14] Pawar, K. N. (2007), Physiological Indices for Drought Tolerance in Rabi Sorghum. Dissertation. Dharwad University, Dharwad.

[15] Sharma, K.C., D.I. Singh and D.Singh. (2003), Variation and character association in fodder yield and related traits in pearl millet. Indian Journal of genetics and Plant Breeding 63 (2): 115 -118.

[16] Chohan, M. S. M. , N. Muhammad, H. K. Amed and A. K. Raiz. (2006), Performance of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum) varieties for green fodder yield. Journal of Agricultural Resources 44 (1): 23- 27.

[17] Borrell, A.K., G. Hammer and E.V. Oosterom. (2001), Stay-green: A consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling. Ann. Appl. Biol. 138:91-95.

[18] Saba, I., H.G. Ahmed. And U. Aliyu. (2015), Growth and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum galaucum(L). As influenced by varieties and inrarow spacing in jokota, North western Nigeria. Journal of global Bioscience. 4(2): 2641-2648.

[19] Egharevba,P.N.,S.M.abed and D.A.Labe. (1984), Effect of row spacing on some agronomic characteristics and yield of pearl millet(Pennisetum typhoides) Maydza XXIX, Pp193-202.

[20] Shah, I.A., H. U.-Rahman, S. M. A. Shah, Z. Shah, S. R. Interamullah and M. Noor. (2012), Characterization of pearl millet germplasm for various morphology and fodder yield parameters. Pakistan Journal of Botany 44 (1): 273-279.

[21] Hassen, A.M. and A.T.S. Bibin. (2010), Response of three millet varieties to N fertilizers in the semi-arid region of North-East Nigeria. Continental Journal of Agronomy 4: 10-14.

[22] Hussain N., M.S. Baloch, M.Y.M. Naeem, A. Z. Khakwani and I.Begun. (2011), Performance of sorghum varieties in Potohar region. Gomal University Journal of Research 27 (2): 26-30.

[23] Roden, P., A.Negusse, T.Eskinder and K. Thomas. (2006), Participatory on-farm appraisal of improved pearl millet varieties in Eritrea. SLM Eritrea report 8. http://www.cde.unibe.ch./CDE/pdf/ReportERI12 (Accessed on 18 July 2017).

[24] National Agricultural Research Institute. (2006), Annual report. Asmara, Eritrea.

[25] Mustapha, O.T and Y. Mustapha. (2007), Growth and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.R.Br.) Influenced by downy mildew and smut diseases in Kabunga area of Kano State, Nigeria. Ethnobotanical leaflets 11(5): 27-31.

[26] Bhasker Raj, A.G., F.R. Bidinger, V.P. Panduranga Rao, and Negusse Abraha. (2000), A Survey Report of Downy Mildew Incidence in Farmers’ Fields of Anseba and Gash Barka Regions.

[27] Totok, A. D. H., T.K.Shon. and T. Yoshida. (1998), Effects of Selection for Yield Components on Grain Yield in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum typhoideum Rich). Plant Production Science 1(1): 52-55.

[28] Kumar, A. and A. Roa. (1987), Diversity and utilization of pearl millet germplasm. Proceedings international pearl millet workshop. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. 69- 82.

[29] Zelalem, G.T. (2014), Physiological and Agronomic performance evaluation of stay green sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) varieties at Shewa Robit,Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia.

[30] Chaudhry, H. M., G. M. Subhani , M.S. Sahaheen, and U. Saleem. (2003), Correlation and path coefficient analysis in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 6(6):597-600.

[31] Wani, S.P., M.A. Zambre and K.K. Lee. (1990), Genotypic diversity in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) for nitrogen and phosphorus and potassium use efficiencies. Plant Nutrition - Physiology and Applications 22(8): 595-601.

[32] Seghatoleslami, M., M. Kafi and E. Majid. (2008), Effect of drought stress at different growth stages on yield and water use efficiency of five Prosomillet (PannicummillaceumL.) genotypes. Pak. J. Bot. 40:1427-1432.

[33] Al Hakimi, A., P. Monneveux and G. Galiba. (1995), Soluble sugars, proline and Relative Water Content (RWC) as traits for improving drought tolerance and divergent selection for RWC from T. polonicuminto T. durum. J. Genetics and Breeding 49:237-244.

[34] Obeng, E., E. Cebert, B. P. Singh, R. Ward, M. N. Leopold and D. A. Mays. (2012), Growth and grain yield of pearl millet genotypes at different levels of nitrogen fertilization in southern united states. Journal of agricultural sciences 4(12): 155-163.

[35] Akromah, R., D. Afribeh and M.S. Abdulai. (2008), Genetic variation and trait correlations in bird resistant pearl millet landrace population. Africa Biotechnology 7(12):1847-1850.

[36] Gilijamse, E., H.D. Frinking, M.J. Jeger. (1997), Occurrence and epidemiology of pearl millet downy mildew, Sclerospora graminicola in Southwest Niger. International Journal of Pest Management 42: 279- 283.

[37] Anaso, A.B. (1996), Pearl millet downy mildew in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Disease incidence and loss estimates. Nigerian Journal of Plant Protection 16(5): 82-92.

[38] Quendeba, B., G. Ejeta, W.W. Hanna, A.K. Kumar. (1995), Diversity among African pearl millet landrace populations. Crop Science 35(9): 919-924.

Downloads

How to Cite

Tesfagiorgis, H. T., Araia, W., & Angiras, N. N. (2021). Evaluation of Germplasm of Pearl Millet (Penissetum glaucum L.) for Agronomic, Physiological and Biochemical Traits under Semi-arid Conditions of Hamelmalo. Journal of Botanical Research, 3(3), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.30564/jbr.v3i3.3319

Issue

Article Type

Articles