Planktonic Scenario of the River Ganga & Yamuna at Prayagraj in COVID-19 Lockdown: A Case Study

Kalpana Srivastava (ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, 211002, India)
Jitendra Kumar (ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, 211002, India)
Dharmnath Jha (ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, 211002, India)
Venkatesh Ramrao Thakur (ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, 211002, India)
Vijay kumar (ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, 211002, India)
Basanta kumar Das (ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, West Bengal, 700120, India)

Article ID: 4275

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jfsr.v4i1.4275

Abstract


Ganga is the most prestigious river of India. The COVID-19 lockdown may have forced us to stay indoors, but it has been boon for pollution-ridden Ganga and Yamuna. Plankton is tiny organisms drifting with water current, influenced by river physical and chemical factors. During lockdown anthropogenic factors were reduced which affected water and plankton quality. Plankton samples were collected from the upstream of the river Ganga (Shankerghat, latitude 25030’28” N and longitude, 81052’10”E) and Yamuna (near boat club, latitude 25024’29”N and longitude 81054’50”E) at Prayagraj, during national lockdown. In the before lockdown period (2019), total 28 planktonic taxa were recorded from the river Ganga, among them 10 taxa from Bacillariophyceae, 15 from Chlorophyceae and 3 from Myxophyceae. While during LD period total 54 genera with 86 species was recorded (Bacillariophyceae 10 taxa, Chlorophyceae 23 taxa, Myxophyceae 9 taxa, Euglenophyceae 2 taxa, Dianophyceae, 1, Rotiferea 7 taxa, Protozoa 2 taxa). Various species of green algae were observed in this small period of lockdown, some species were not observed since a long, like Pediastrum tetras, Scenedesmus abundans, Ankistrodesmus fusiformis, and Brachionus angularis. Various species of phytoplankton and zooplankton were in reproductive phase because river was flowing silently, without any internal and external disturbance. Ganga was more affected by anthropogenic activity and factory discharge than Yamuna So lack of chemicals in the water and minimum human interference favoured auto rejuvenation of Ganga in terms of plankton quality, diversity and reproduction behaviour. Such type of environmental changes may stimulate for origin of new species and disappear or reappear of various aquatic species.


Keywords


River Ganga and Yamuna; Plankton; Diversity; COVID-19; Lockdown & Prayagraj

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] Ministry of Home Affairs, (MHA), 2020. Order: Extension of Lockdown. Order No. 40-3/2020-DMI(A), MHA, Govt. of India. [Accessed 2020 May 12].

[2] Yunus, A.P., Masago, Y., Hijioka, Y,. 2020. COVID-19 and surface water quality: improved lake water quality during lockdown. Sci Total Environ. 731, 139012.

[3] Central Pollution Control Board, (CPCB), 2020. Impact of lockdown on water quality of river Ganga. CPCB, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

[4] David, T., Clarence, L., 2001. Human-caused environmental change: Impacts on plant diversity and evolution PNAS. 98(10), 5433-5440.

[5] Braga, F., Scarpa, G.M., Brando, V.E., Manfè, G., Zaggia, L., 2020. COVID-19 lockdown measures reveal human impact on water transparency in the Venice Lagoon. Sci Total Environ. 736, 139612.

[6] Sharma, A.K., Malik, D.S., Bargali, H., 2018. Status of plankton diversity in relation to water quality of Bhagirathi riverine system in Garhwal Himalaya. International Journal of Advance Science Research. 3, 30-37.

[7] Carle, F.L., 1979. Environmental monitoring potential of the odonata with a list of rare and endangered anisoptera of Virginia, United States. Odontologia. 8, 319-323.

[8] Amarsinghe, B.P., Viverberg, J., 2002. Primary production in a tropical reservoir in Sri-Lanka. Hydrobiologia. 487, 85-93.

[9] APHA, 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association.

[10] Welch, P.S., 1952. Limnological Methods. The Blakistan Company, Philadelphia.

[11] Laal, A.K., Karthikeyan, M., 1993. Rotifers pollution or productivity indicators. Current science. 65(11), 77-79.

[12] Abdul, G., Khan, S., Mirza, Z.S., Husain, A., Zafer, N., 2012. Community structure of epiphytic Rotifers of a floodplain. Biologia. 58, 1-12.

[13] Ray, P.S., Singh, S.B., Sehgal, K.L., 1966. A study of some aspects of ecology of the river Ganga and Jamuna at Allahabad in 58-59. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci Ind.(B). 36(111), 235-272.

[14] Mohan Vishwa, 2020. Cleaner Ganga: CPCB validates improvement in water quality, see bigger change in river stretch in U. P.,TNN April 28. 13, 42 IST.

[15] Tunin-Ley, A., Ibañez, F., Labat, J., Zingone, A., Lemée, R., 2009. Phytoplankton biodiversity and NW Mediterranean Sea warming: Changes in the Dianoflagellates genus Ceratium in the 20th century. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 375, 85-99.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2022 Kalpana Srivastava, Jitendra Kumar, Venkatesh Ramrao Thakur, Vijay kumar, Basanta kumar Das


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.