Comparison of U-spatial statistics method with Classical Statistics results in the determination of geochemical anomalies of Epithermal Gold in Khoshnameh area, Hashtjin, Iran

Mirmahdi Seyedrahimi-Niaraq (Faculty of Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.)

Abstract


In this study, methods based on the distribution model (with and without personal opinion) were used for the separation of anomalous zones, which include two different methods of U-spatial statistics and mean plus values of standard deviation (). The primary purpose is to compare the results of these methods with each other. To increase the accuracy of comparison, regional geochemical data were used where occurrences and mineralization zones of epithermal gold have been introduced. The study area is part of the Hashtjin geological map, which is structurally part of the folded and thrust belt and part of the Alborz Tertiary magmatic complex. Samples were taken from secondary lithogeochemical environments. Au element data concerning epithermal gold reserves were used to investigate the efficacy of these two methods. In the U- spatial statistics method, and criteria were used to determine the threshold, and in the  method, the element enrichment index of the region rock units was obtained with grouping these units. The anomalous areas were identified by, and criteria. Comparison of methods was made considering the position of discovered occurrences and the occurrences obtained from these methods, the flexibility of the methods in separating the anomalous zones, and the two-dimensional spatial correlation of the three elements As, Pb, and Ag with Au element. The ability of two methods to identify potential areas is acceptable. Among these methods, it seems the   method with  criteria has a high degree of flexibility in separating anomalous regions in the case of epithermal type gold deposits.


Keywords


Geochemical exploration, , U-Spatial statistics method, Anomalous area, Epithermal gold

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1]Agterberg, F.P., Cheng, Q., Brown, A. and Good, D., 1996, Multifractal modeling of fractures in the Lac du Bonnet batholith, Manitoba. Computers & Geosciences, 22:497–507.

[2]Afzal, P., Khakzad, A., Moarefvand, P., Omran, N.R., Esfandiari, B., Alghalandis, Y.F., 2010, Geochemical anomaly separation by multifractal modeling in Kahang (Gor Gor) porphyry system, Central Iran. Journal of Geochemical exploration, 104:34–46.

[3]Afzal, P., Alghalandis, Y.F., Khakzad, A., Moarefvand, P., Omran, N.R., 2011, Delineation of mineralization zones in porphyry Cu deposits by fractal concentration–volume modeling. Journal of Geochemical exploration, 108: 220–232.

[4]Carranza, E.J.M., 2008, Geochemical anomaly and mineral prospectivity mapping in GIS. Vol 11, Elsevier.

[5]Carranza, E.J.M., Zuo, R. and Cheng, Q., 2012. Fractal/multifractal modelling of geochemical exploration data. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 122, pp.1-3.

[6]Cheng, Q., 1999, Spatial and scaling modelling for geochemical anomaly separation. Journal of Geochemical exploration, 65: 175-194.

[7]Cheng, Q., 2001, Multifractal and geostatistic methods for characterizing local structure and singularity properties of exploration geochemical anomalies. Journal of China University of Geosciences, 26:161–166.

[8]Cheng, Q., Agterberg, F. and Ballantyne, S., 1994, The separation of geochemical anomalies from background by fractal methods. Journal of Geochemical exploration, 51: 109-130.

[9]Cheng, Q., Agterberg, F. and Bonham-Carter, G., 1996, A spatial analysis method for geochemical anomaly separation. Journal of Geochemical exploration, 56: 183-195.

[10]Cheng, Q., Bonham-Carter, G., Wang, W., Zhang, S., Li, W. and Qinglin, X. 2011, A spatially weighted principal component analysis for multielement geochemical data for mapping locations of felsic intrusions in the Gejiu mineral district of Yunnan, China. Computers & Geosciences, 37: 662–669.

[11]Cheng, Q., Xia, Q., Li, W., Zhang, S., Chen, Z., Zuo, R. and Wang, W., 2010, Density/area power-lawmodels for separating multi-scale anomalies of ore and toxic elements in stream sediments in Gejiu mineral district, Yunnan Province, China. Biogeosciences, 7:3019–3025.

[12]Cheng, Q., Xu, Y. and Grunsky, E., 2000, Integrated spatial and spectrum method for geochemical anomaly separation. Natural Resources Research, 9: 43-52.

[13]Darabi-Golestan, F., Ghavami-Riabi, R., Khalokakaie, R., Asadi-Haroni, H. and Seyedrahimi-Niaraq, M., 2013, Interpretation of lithogeochemical and geophysical data to identify the buried mineralized area in Cu-Au porphyry of Dalli-Northern Hill. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6: 4499-4509.

[14]Geology society of Iran (GSI), 2006, Report of gold exploration condition in Iran.

[15]Ghannadpour, S.S. and Hezarkhani, A., 2016, Introducing 3D U-statistic method for separating anomaly from background in exploration geochemical data with associated software development. Journal of Earth System Science, 125: 387-401.

[16]Ghannadpour, S.S., Hezarkhani, A., 2017, Comparing U-statistic and nonstructural methods for separating anomaly and generating geochemical anomaly maps of Cu and Mo in Parkam district, Kerman, Iran. Carbonates and Evaporites, 32(2):155–166.

[17]Grunsky, E.C. and de Caritat, P., 2020. State-of-the-art analysis of geochemical data for mineral exploration. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 20(2), pp.217-232.

[18]Ghavami-Riabi, R., Seyedrahimi-Niaraq, M., Khalokakaie, R. and Hazareh, M., 2010, U-spatial statistic data modeled on a probability diagram for investigation of mineralization phases and exploration of shear zone gold deposits. Journal of Geochemical exploration, 104: 27-33.

[19]Ghezelbash, R. and Maghsoudi, A., 2018, Comparison of U-spatial statistics and C–A fractal models for delineating anomaly patterns of porphyry-type Cu geochemical signatures in the Varzaghan district, NW Iran. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 350: 180-191.

[20]Ghezelbash, R., Maghsoudi, A. and Daviran, M., 2019, Combination of multifractal geostatistical interpolation and spectrum–area (S–A) fractal model for Cu–Au geochemical prospects in Feizabad district, NE Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12:152.

[21]Ghezelbash, R., Maghsoudi, A. and Carranza, E.J.M., 2019, An Improved Data- Driven Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Procedure for Spatial Modeling of Mineral Prospectivity: Adaption of Prediction–Area Plot and Logistic Functions. Natural Resourse Research, 28(4):1299–1316.

[22]Gonçalves, M.A.,, Mateus, A. and Oliveira, V., 2001, Geochemical anomaly separation by multifractal modelling. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 72: 91-114.

[23]Govett, G., Goodfellow, W., Chapman, R. and Chork, C., 1975, Exploration geochemistry—distribution of elements and recognition of anomalies. Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, 7: 415-446.

[24]Hawkes, H.E. and Webb, J.S., 1962, Geochemistry in mineral exploration harper and row, New York, P.415.

[25]Levinson, A.A., 1974, Introduction to exploration geochemistry. Applied publishing Ltd, Illinois, USA, pp. 924.

[26]Lepeltier, C., 1969, A simplified statistical treatment of geochemical data by ghraphical representation. Economic Geology, 64:538-550.

[27]Li, C., Ma, T. and Shi, J., 2003, Application of a fractal method relating concentrations and distances for separation of geochemical anomalies from background. Journal of Geochemical exploration, 77: 167-175.

[28]Lima, A., De Vivo, B., Cicchella, D., Cortini, M. and Albanese, S., 2003, Multifractal IDW interpolation and fractal filtering method in environmental studies: an application on regional stream sediments of (Italy), Campania region. Applied geochemistry, 18: 1853-1865.

[29]Lin, Y.P., 2002, Multivariate geostatistical methods to identify and map spatial variations of soil heavy metals. Environmental Geolology, 42:1–10.

[30]Liu, Y., Cheng, Q., Carranza, E.J.M. and Zhou, K., 2019, Assessment of geochemical anomaly uncertainty through geostatistical simulation and singularity analysis. Natural Resources Research, 28: 199-212.

[31]Mandelbrot, B.B.,, Pignoni, R., 1983, The fractal geometry of nature, WH freeman, New York. vol 173.

[32]Mahdiyanfar, H., 2019. Detection of Mo geochemical anomaly in depth using a new scenario based on spectrum–area fractal analysis. Journal of Mining and Environment, 10(3), pp.695-704.

[33]Parsa, M., Maghsoudi, A., Yousefi, M. and Sadeghi, M., 2017, Multifractal analysis of stream sediment geochemical data: Implications for hydrothermal nickel prospection in an arid terrain, eastern Iran. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 181: 305-317.

[34]Rantitsch, G., 2004, Geochemical exploration in a mountainous area by statistical modeling of polypopulational data distributions. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 82: 79-95.

[35]Rose, A.W., Hawkes, H.E. and Webb, J.S., 1979, Geochemistry in mineral Exploration. Academic Press, London, pp.657.

[36]Seyedrahimi-Niaraq, M., Hekmatnejad, A., 2020, The efficiency and accuracy of probability diagram, spatial statistic and fractal methods in the identification of shear zone gold mineralization: a case study of the Saqqez gold ore district, NW Iran. Acta Geochimica, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-020-00413-7.

[37]Shahi, H., Ghavami, R., Kamkar Rouhani, A., 2018. Identification of mineralization pattern in high frequencies of geochemical data by using the new approach of DWT-PCA.

[38]Shahi, H., Ghavami, R., Kamkar Rouhani, A., 2016. Comparison of mineralization pattern of geochemical data in spatial and position-scale domain using new DWT-PCA approach. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 88(2), pp.235-244.

[39]Shahi, H., Ghavami, R., Kamkar Rouhani, A., Asadi-Haroni, H., 2015, Application of Fourier and wavelet approaches for identification of geochemical anomalies. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 106:118–128.

[40]Sinclair, A., 1974, Selection of threshold values in geochemical data using probability graphs. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 3: 129-149.

[41]Sinclair, A., 1991, A fundamental approach to threshold estimation in exploration geochemistry: probability plots revisited. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 41: 1-22.

[42]Solovov, A.P., 1985, Geochemical prospecting for mineral deposits. Mir Publisher.

[43]Solovov, A.P., 1990, Handbook on Geochemical Prospecting for Useful Minerals, Moscow. Nedra Publishing house.

[44]Stanford, F., Pierson, T. and Crovelli, R.A., 1993, An objective replacement method for censord geochemical data. Mathematical Geology, 27(1):59-79.

[45]Stanley, C.R. and Sinclair, A.J., 1989, Comparison of Probability Plots and the Gap statistic in selection of Threshold of Exploration Geochemistry Data. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 32:355-357.

[46]Towsehe Olume Zamin Company (TOZ Co.), 2003, Systematic geochemical explorations in leaf of Hashtjin (1:100,000). Report of Ardabil province SAMT organization.

[47]Wellmer, F.W., 1998, Statistical Evaluations in Exploration for Mineral Deposits. Springer New York, pp.379.

[48]Yousefi, M. and Carranza, E.J.M., 2015, Prediction–area (P–A) plot and C–A fractal analysis to classify and evaluate evidential maps for mineral prospectivity modeling. Computers & Geosciences, 79: 69-81.

[49]Yousefi, M., Kreuzer, O.P., Nykänen, V. and Hronsky, J.M., 2019, Exploration information systems-a proposal for the future use of GIS in mineral exploration targeting. Ore Geology Reviews: 103005.

[50]Yusta, I., Velasco, F. and Herrero, J.-M., 1998, Anomaly threshold estimation and data normalization using EDA statistics: application to lithogeochemical exploration in Lower Cretaceous Zn–Pb carbonate-hosted deposits, northern Spain. Applied geochemistry, 13: 421-439.

[51]Wang, Z., Zuo, R. and Dong, Y., 2019. Mapping geochemical anomalies through integrating random forest and metric learning methods. Natural Resources Research, 28(4), pp.1285-1298.

[52]Zarnab Ekteshaf Company (ZE Co.), 2006, Exploration of polymetallic elements (Gold and other elements) in the Khoshnameh village limit of Hashtjin. Report of Ardabil province SAMT organization.

[53]Ziaii, M., Safaria, S., Timkinb, T., Voroshilovb, Va. and Yakichb, T., 2019, Identification of geochemical anomalies of the porphyry–Cu deposits using concentration gradient modelling: A case study, Jebal-Barez area, Iran. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 199:16-30.

[54]Zuo, R., 2017. Machine learning of mineralization-related geochemical anomalies: A review of potential methods. Natural Resources Research, 26(4), pp.457-464.

[55]Zuo, R., Cheng, Q. and Xia, Q., 2009, Application of fractal models to characterization of vertical distribution of geochemical element concentration. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 102: 37-43.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jgr.v3i2.2935

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2021 Mirmahdi Seyedrahimi-Niaraq Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.