The Use of Computer-Assisted Keyword Technique in Learning Pronunciation of English Weak Forms

Hassan Saleh Mahdi (University of Bisha)

Article ID: 255


Keyword technique has been investigated extensively in the literature to examine its effectiveness on L2 pronunciation. However, previous studies have not examined how computer-assisted keyword technique could aid L2 learner to pronounce weak forms in English accurately. Therefore, this study aims at investigating the effect of computer-assisted keyword technique on acquiring weak forms pronunciation. A total of 60 Arab EFL learners participated in the study and assigned into three groups. The first group viewed a video containing weak forms in English dubbed with L1 keyword. The second group was taught weak forms and aided with keyword traditionally. The third group was taught the same content using traditional way without keyword. Results of the post-tests indicated that participants in keyword technique (either computer-assisted or traditionally) outscored the participants who did not use keyword technique. The study concluded that keyword technique, either used with the help of computer or used traditionally, is a useful tool to enhance weak forms pronunciation.  


Pronunciation; Keyword technique; Weak forms; CAPT; Dual coding theory

Full Text:



[1] Lee, J., Jang, J. & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36, 345–366. doi:10.1093/applin/amu040

[2] Nair, R., Krishnasamy, R. & De Mello, G. (2017). Rethinking the teaching of pronunciation in the ESL classroom. The English Teacher, 35, 27–40.

[3] Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1997). Pronunciation instruction for fossilized learners. Can it help? Applied Language Learning, 8(2), 217–35.‏

[4] Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J. & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410.‏

[5] Jamieson, J., Chapelle, C., & Preiss, S. (2005). CALL Evaluation by Developers, a Teacher, and Students. CALICO Journal, 23, 93-138.

[6] Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T. & O’Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 24–49.

[7] Pennington, M. C. & Richards, J. C. (1986). Pronunciation revisited. TESOL Quarterly, 20 (2), 207–225.‏

[8] Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

[9] Kang, O. (2010). ESL learners’ attitudes toward pronunciation instruction and varieties of English. Proceedings of the 1st Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Ames, IA: Iowa State University (pp: 105–118).‏

[10] Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research‐based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379-397.

[11] Morley, J. (1991). The pronunciation component in teaching English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 481–520.‏

[12] Couper, G. (2017). Teacher cognition of pronunciation teaching: Teachers' concerns and issues. TESOL Quarterly, 51(4), 820–843. doi: 10.1002/tesq.354

[13] Richards, J.C. and Schmidt, R. (2002) Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics (3rd edition). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

[14] Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[15] Atkinson, R. C. & Raugh, M. R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary. Journal of experimental psychology: Human learning and memory, 1(2), 126-133

[16] Beaton, A., Gruneberg, M., and Ellis, N. (1995). Retention of foreign vocabulary using the keyword method: a ten-year follow-up. Second Language Research, 11, 112-120.

[17] Wang, A. Y. & Thomas, M. H. (1995). Effect of keywords on long-term retention: help or hindrance? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 468-475.

[18] Atay, D., & Ozbulgan, C. (2007). Memory strategy instruction, contextual learning and ESP vocabulary recall. English for specific purposes, 26(1), 39-51.

[19] Mahdi, H. S. & Gubeily, M. A. (2018). The Effect of Using Bizarre Images as Mnemonics to Enhance Vocabulary Learning. Journal of Social Studies, 24(1), 113-135.

[20] McDaniel, M. A. & Pressley, M. (1989). Keyword and context instruction of new vocabulary meanings: effects on text comprehension and memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 204–213

[21] Pressley, M., Levin, J. R. & Miller, S. (1981). Cognitive strategy research: educational application. New York: Springer- Verlag

[22] Shapiro, A. M. & Waters, D. L. (2005). An investigation of the cognitive processes underlying the keyword method of foreign vocabulary learning. Language teaching research, 9 (2), 129-146. 10.1191/1362168805lr151oa

[23] Sagarra, N. & Alba, M. (2006). The key is in the keyword: L2 learning vocabulary learning methods with beginning learners of Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 228–243.

[24] Taheri, A. A., & Davoudi, M. (2016). The effect of the keyword method on vocabulary learning and long-term retention. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(1), 114-125. Available on

[25] Tavakoli, M. & Gerami, E. (2013). The effect of keyword and pictorial methods on EFL learners' vocabulary learning and retention. Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, (19), 299-316. Available on

[26] Avila, E. & Sadoski, M. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquire English vocabulary. Language learning, 46(3), 379-395.

[27] Wyra, M., Lawson, M. J. & Hungi, N. (2007). The mnemonic keyword method: The effects of bidirectional retrieval training and of ability to image on foreign language vocabulary recall. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 360-371.

[28] Rodriguez, M. & Sadowki, M. (2000). Effects of rote, context, keyword, and context/keyword methods on retention of vocabulary in EFL classrooms. Language learning, 50(2), 385-412.

[29] Beaton, A., Gruneberg, M., Hyde, C., Shufflebottom, A., & Sykes, R. (2005). Facilitation of receptive and productive foreign vocabulary learning using the keyword method: The role of image quality. Memory, 13(5), 458-471.

[30] Gruneberg, M. M. & Pascoe, K. (1996). The effectiveness of the keyword method for receptive and productive foreign vocabulary learning in the elderly. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 102-109.

[31] Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E. & Fulk, B. J. (1990). Teaching abstract vocabulary with the keyword method: Effects on recall and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(2), 92-96.

[32] Hall, J. W. (1988). On the utility of the keyword mnemonic for vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 554

[33] Hogben, D. & Lawson, M. J. (1994). Keyword and multiple elaboration strategies for vocabulary acquisition in foreign language learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(3), 367-376.

[34] Van Hell, J. G. & Mahn, A. C. (1997). Keyword mnemonics versus rote rehearsal: Learning concrete and abstract foreign words by experienced and inexperienced learners. Language Learning, 47(3), 507-546.

[35] Willerman, B. & Melvin, B. (1979). Reservations about the keyword mnemonic. Canadian Modern Language Review, 35, 443-452.

[36] Mahdi, H. M. & Al-Khateeb, A. A. (2019). The effectiveness of computer-assisted pronunciation training: A meta-analysis, Review of Education Journal.

[37] Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York

[38] Pennington, M. C. (1999). Computer-aided pronunciation pedagogy: Promise, limitations, directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(5), 427–440.‏

[39] Scarcella, R. C. & Oxford, R. L. (1994). Second language pronunciation: State of the art in instruction. System, 22(2), 221–230.

[40] Luo, B. (2016). Evaluating a computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) technique for efficient classroom instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 451–476.

[41] Pi-Hua, T. (2006). Bridging pedagogy and technology: User evaluation of pronunciation-oriented CALL software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 375–397.

[42] Neri, A, Cucchiarini, C. & Strik, H. (2008). The effectiveness of computer-based speech corrective feedback for improving segmental quality in L2 Dutch. ReCALL, 20(2), 225-243.

[43] Fouz-González, J. (2015) Trends and Directions in Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Training. In: Mompean J.A., Fouz-González J. (Eds), Investigating English Pronunciation, pp. 314–342, Palgrave Macmillan, London,

[44] Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.

[45] Smith, B. (2001). Arabic speakers. In: Swan, M., Smith, B. (Eds.), Learner English. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (pp. 195—213)

[46] Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. Reprinted 1979, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

[47] Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

[48] Takac, V. P. (2008). Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Foreign Language Acquisition, Multilingual Matters Ltd

[49] Isaacs, T., Trofimovich, P. & Foote, J. A. (2017). Developing a user-oriented second language comprehensibility scale for English-medium universities. Language Testing DOI:



  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2019 Hassan Saleh Mahdi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.