Comparative Study on Results of Euler, Improved Euler and Runge-Kutta Methods for Solving the Engineering Unknown Problems

Khaing Khaing Lwin (Myanmar Aerospace Engineering University)

Abstract


The paper presents the comparative study on numerical methods of Euler method, Improved Euler method and fourth-order Runge-Kutta method for solving the engineering problems and applications. The three proposed methods are quite efficient and practically well suited for solving the unknown engineering problems. This paper aims to enhance the teaching and learning quality of teachers and students for various levels. At each point of the interval, the value of y is calculated and compared with its exact value at that point. The next interesting point is the observation of error from those methods. Error in the value of y is the difference between calculated and exact value. A mathematical equation which relates various functions with its derivatives is known as a differential equation. It is a popular field of mathematics because of its application to real-world problems. To calculate the exact values, the approximate values and the errors, the numerical tool such as MATLAB is appropriate for observing the results. This paper mainly concentrates on identifying the method which provides more accurate results. Then the analytical results and calculates their corresponding error were compared in details. The minimum error directly reflected to realize the best method from different numerical methods. According to the analyses from those three approaches, we observed that only the error is nominal for the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method.

Keywords


Numerical Method; Euler method; Improved Euler method; Runge-Kutta method; Solving the Engineering Problems

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1]Steven C. Chapra, "Applied Numerical Methods with MATLAB for Engineers and Scientists", Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2012, pp.555-567.

[2]S.R.Otto and J.P.Denier, "An Introduction To Programming and Numerical Methods in MATLAB" Springer-Verlag London Limited, 2005, pp.1-263.

[3]John Bird, "Higher Engineering Mathematics" Sixth Edition, Elsevier Ltd., 2010, pp.461-471.

[4]Alan Jeffrey, "Advanced Engineering Mathematics", A Harcourt Science and Technology Company, USA, 2002, pp.225-253.

[5]Erwin Kreyszig, "Advanced Engineering Mathematics", 9th Edition, Laurie Rosatone, America, 1999, pp.886-898.

[6]Erwin Kreyszig, "Advanced Engineering Mathematics", 10th Edition, Laurie Rosatone, America, 1999, pp.900-911.

[7]Jain MK, Iyengar SR and Jain RK, "Numerical Methods for Scientific and Engineering Computation", 6th Edition, New Age International, India, 2012, pp.180-240.

[8]Steven C. Chapra and Raymond P. Canale, "Numerical Method for Engineers", Seventh Edition, McGraw Hill Education, New York, 2010, pp.709-744.

[9]S.D. Conte and Carl de Boor, "Elementary Numerical Analysis", Third Edition, McGraw Hill, 1965, pp.346-362.

[10]Aung Myint, "Using MATLAB & Simulink", Australia, 2007, pp.1-182.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jiep.v3i3.2881

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2021 Khaing Khaing Lwin Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.