The Comparative Effects of Cyclic Inquiry Model, Conceptual Change Text, and Traditional Instructions on Student Understanding of Photosynthesis and Respiration in Plant

Salem Abedel Aziz ALkhawaldeh (Al al-Bayt University)

Article ID: 335

Abstract


The aim of this study was to explore the effects of the cyclic inquiry model, conceptual change texts, and traditional instructions on promoting understanding of photosynthesis and respiration in plants. The data were obtained from 33 students in the first experimental group taught with cyclic inquiry model (CIM), 34 students in the second experimental group taught with conceptual change texts (CCT), and 34 students in the control group taught with traditional instruction (TI). After instruction, data were analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using Pre-test scores and Logical thinking scores as covariates. The results indicated the cyclic inquiry model (CIM) and conceptual change texts (CCT) treatment groups significantly outperformed the traditional instruction (TI)  group in understanding of photosynthesis and respiration in plants. A statistically significant difference between two experimental groups was found in favor of the of cyclic inquiry model CIM.

Keywords


Cyclic inquiry model; Conceptual change text; Photosynthesis; Misconceptions; Science education

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] Susanti R. Misconceptions of Biology education student of teacher training and education of Sriwijiaya university to the concept of photosynthesis and respiration 2018; Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1022 012056.

[2] Ameyaw Y. Evaluating students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in Ghanaian senior high students. International Journal of Advanced Biological Research 2016; 6(2):202-209.

[3] Svadova K. Secondary school students' misconceptions about photosynthesis and plant respiration: Preliminary results. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 2014; 10(1): 59-67.

[4] Alkhawaldeh S, Al Olaimat, A. The Contribution of Conceptual Change Text Accompanied by Concept Mapping to Eleventh-Grade Students’ Understanding of Cellular Respiration Concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2010; 19: 115–125.

[5] Yenilmez A, Tekkaya C. Enhancing understanding of photosynthesis and respiration in plant through conceptual change approach. Journal of science Education & Technology 2006; 15(1): 81-87.

[6] Ozay E, Oztas F. Secondary students interpretation of photosynthesis and plant nutrition. Journal of Biological Education 2003; 37(2): 68-70.

[7] Haslam F, Treagust, DF. Diagnosing secondary students misconception of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple-choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education 1987; 21(3): 203-211.

[8] Novak J D. Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change in Limited or Inappropriate Prepositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment of Learners. Science Education 2002; 86: 548–571.

[9] Posner MG, Strike KA, Hewson PW et al. Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change. Science Education 1982; 66: 211–227.

[10] Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. Improving Conceptual Change concerning Photosynthesis through Text Design. Learning and Instruction 2001; 11: 241–257.

[11] Chambers Sk, Andre T. Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1997; 34(2): 107-123.

[12] Tas E, Gulen S, Oner Z etal. The effects of classic and web-designed conceptual change texts on the subject of water chemistry. International Journal of Elementary Education 2015; 7(2): 263-280.

[13] Sodervik I, Mikkila-Erdman M, Vilppu H. Promoting understanding of photosynthesis among elementary school student teachers through text design. Journal of Science Teacher Education 2014; 25(5): 581-600.

[14] Alkhawaldeh S. Prediction/discussion-based learning cycle versus conceptual change text: comparative effects on students’ understanding of genetics. Research in Science and Technological Education 2013; 31 (2): 168-183.

[15] Balci S, Cakiroglu J, Tekkaya C. Engagement, exploration, explanation, extension and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2006; 34(6): 199-203.

[16] Alparslan C, Tekkaya C, Geban O. Using the conceptual change instruction to improve learning. Educational Research 2003; 37 (3): 133-137.

[17] Cakir O, Geba O , Yuruk, N. Effectiveness of conceptual change text oriented instruction on students’ understanding of cellular respiration concepts. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2002; 30(4): 239-243.

[18] Abdi A. The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students' academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2014; 2(1): 37-41.

[19] Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, eds. How People Learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press 2000.

[20] Secker CV. Effects of Inquiry-Based teacher practices on science excellence and equity. The Journal of Educational Research 2002; 95(3): 151-160.

[21] Sandoval WA, Reiser, BJ. Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education 2004; 88: 342-375.

[22] Moyer R, Hackett J, Everett S. Teaching science as investigations: modeling inquiry through learning cycle lessons. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall 2006.

[23] Jarrett D. Inquiry strategies for science and mathematics learning. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory 1997.

[24] Short K, Laird J, Ferguson, M, et al. Learning together through inquiry: from Columbus to integrated curriculum. York, ME: Stenhouse 1996.

[25] Bruce B, Lin C. Voices of youth: podcasting as a means for inquiry –based community engagement. E-Learning 2009; 6(2): 230-240.

[26] Bruce B, Bishop A. Using the web to support inquiry-based literacy development, Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 2002, 45(8): 706-714.

[27] Bruce B, Davidson J. An inquiry model for literacy across the curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies 1996, 28(3): 281-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022027980280303

[28] Casey L, Bruce BC, Martin, A, et al. (2009). Digital Literacy: New Approaches to Participation and Inquiry Learning to Foster Literacy Skills among Primary School Children. Dublin: Centre for Research and Innovation in Learning and Teaching, National College of Ireland. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/9765.

[29] Bruce B, Jakobsson E, Thakkar U, et al. Democratizing Bioinformatics research in high school classroom. American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, Chicago IL, 2003; April 21-25.

[30] Albaaly A. The effectiveness of using cyclic inquiry model (CIM) in developing some science processes and the achievement in science among fifth grade pupils at the elementary stage. International Journal for research in Education 2012; 31: 259-284.

[31] Abu al-Rukab A. The effect of Cyclic inquiry model on the acquisition of scientific concepts and scientific thinking skills among fifth grade students in Jordan. Unpublished Master Thesis, Al al –Bayt University, Mafraq, Jordan 2015.

[32] Panasan M, Nuangchalerm P. Learning Outcomes of Project - Based and Inquiry - Based Learning Activities. Journal of Social Sciences 2010; 6 (2): 252-255.

[33] van Rens L, van der Schee J, Pilot A. Teaching Molecular Diffusion Using An Inquiry Approach: Diffusion Activities in A Secondary School Inquiry-Learning Community. Journal of Chemical Education 2009; 86( 12): 1437 – 1441

[34] Tobin K G, Capie W . The development and validation of a group test of logical thinking. Educational Psychology Measurement 1981; 41: 413– 423.

[35] Abu Ruman K. The relationship between formal thinking and science process skills and achievement in science of first scientific secondary grade students. Unpublished MS Thesis, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan 1991.

[36] Sanders M. Erroneous ideas about respiration: the teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1993; 30: 919–934.

[37] Dogru-Atay P, Tekkya, C. Promoting students' learning in genetics with the learning cycle. The Journal of Experimental Education 2008; 76: 259-280.

[38] BouJaude S, Salloum S, Abd-El-Khalick, F. Relationships between selective cognitive variables and students’ ability to solve chemistry problems. International Journal of Science Education 2004; 26: 63–84.

[39] Kang S, Scharmann L C, Noh T. Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education 2004; 34: 71–96.

[40] Johnson MA, Lawson AE. What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1998; 35: 89–103.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jiep.v2i1.335

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2019 Salem Abedel Aziz ALkhawaldeh


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.