Readdressing the Redundancy Effect: A Cognitive Strategy for E-learning Design

Sylvie Studente (Faculty of Business and Management, Regent’s University London, UK)
Filia Garivaldis (School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash University, Australia)
Nina Seppala (School of Management, University College London, UK)

Article ID: 580

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jpr.v1i2.580

Abstract


This study challenges understandings on the ‘redundancy effect’ of cognitive load theory and visual/verbal classifications of dual-coding theory. Current understandings assert that a multimedia mix of narration and text displayed during e-learning leads to cognitive overload, thus, impeding learning[1,2]. Previous research suggests that for optimal learning to occur, the most effective multimedia mix for e-learning presentation is the use of graphics and narration[3-6].

The current study was undertaken with 90 undergraduate students at a British University. Participants were allocated to one of three groups. Each group used a different multimedia mix of a music e-learning program. Participants received learning material electronically, which involved either a mix of narration and text, graphics and text, or graphics and narration. Learning was measured by differences in music knowledge scores obtained before and after receiving the learning material. Results indicate that the combination of text and narration is most effective for learning, compared to combinations of graphics and text and graphics and narration. These findings challenge the currently accepted stance on the redundancy effect in e-learning design.


Keywords


Learning; Memory; Working memory; Graphical user interfaces

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] Craig, S, Gholson, B & Driscoll, D. Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia education environments: effects of agent properties, picture features and redundancy[J].Journal of Educational Psychology, 2002, 94. 428 – 434.

[2] Mayer, R. Applying the science of learning to multimedia instruction[J].The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Cognition in Education, 2011, 55.

[3] Clark, R & Mayer, R. E-learning and the Science of Instruction (2nd ed.) [M]. 2008.

[4] Kim, S & Lombardino, L. Exploring the Effects of Narration and Pictures on Learning for Students with Reading Deficits[J]. Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders, 2017,2(2):116 – 127.

[5] Dunsworth, Q & Atkinson, R. Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent’s image.[J]. Computers and Education, 2007, 49(3): 677 – 690.

[6] Mayer, R. Elements of science of e-learning [J]. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2003, 29(3): 297 – 313

[7] Clark, R, Nguyen, F, & Sweller, J. Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load [M]. 2006.

[8] Sweller, J. Instructional design in technical areas [M]. 1999.

[9] Sweller, J.Cognitive load theory [J]. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Cognition in Education, 2011, 55: 38 – 74.

[10] Truman, S & Truman, P. An investigation into the situated learnability effects of single-and dual-modal systems in education: a report of music-oriented learning environment and science computer-assisted studies [J]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2006, 37(11).

[11] Toh, S, Ahmed, W, Munassar, S & Jaafar, W & Yahaya, W. Redundancy effect in multimedia learning: A closer look[C]. Proceedings of ascilite, 2010.

[12] Atkinson, R & Shiffrin, R. Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes [C]. In K.W spence and J.T Spence (Eds) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 1968, 2: 89 – 195.

[13] Peterson, L & Peterson, M. Short-term retention of individual items [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959, 53: 193 – 198.

[14] Miller, G. The magical number seven, plus or minus two; some limits on our capacity for processing information [J]. Psychological Review. 1956, 63(2): 81 – 97.

[15] Baddeley, A, Working memory [J]. Science, 1992, 255: 556 – 559.

[16] Paivio, A & Csapo, K. Picture superiorty in free recall: imagery or dual coding?[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 1973, 5: 176 – 206.

[17] Paivio, A. Imagery and Verbal Processes [M]. 1971.New York; Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

[18] Paivio, A. Dual coding theory and education [C]. Proceedings of the conference on Pathways to Literacy Achievement for High Poverty Children, 2006.

[19] Dix, Finlay, Abowd & Beale. Human Computer Interaction [M]. 1993.

[20] Sadoski, M. A dual coding theoretical model of reading [C]. In Alvermann, D. E., Unrau, N. J., Ruddell, R. B (Eds.) Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (6th ed.), 2013.

[21] Moreno, R & Mayer, R. Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999, 9(2): 358-368.

[22] Mousavi, S, Low, R, & Sweller, J. Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes [J] . Journal of Educational Psychology, 1995, 87(2): 319–334.

[23] Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. When two sensory modes are better than one [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1997, 3(4): 257-287.

[24] Larson, M & Lockee, B, Streamlined ID: A Practical Guide to Instructional Design [M]. 2014.

[25] Ginns, P. Meta-analysis of the modality effect [J] . Learning and Instruction, 2005, 15: 313–331.

[26] Hede, A. Integrated Model of Multimedia Effects on Learning [J]. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2002, 11(2): 177-191.

[27] Koning, B, Tabbers, H, Rikers, R & Pass, F. Attention cueing as a means to enhance learning from an animation [J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2007, 21(6): 731 – 746.

[28] Reed, S. Effect of computer graphics on improving estimates to algebra word problems [J] . Journal of Educational Psychology, 1985, 77(3): 285 – 298.

[29] Badii, A & Truman, S. Cognitive factors in interface design: an e-learning environment for memory performance and retention optimization[C]. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation , 2001.

[30] Baddeley, A & Hitch, G, Working memory [C]. In G.A Bower (Ed) Recent Advances in Learning and Motivation, (1974), 8: 47 – 90.

[31] Mandl, H Levin, J. Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures[M], 1991.

[32] Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. When redundant on-screen text in multimedia technical instruction can interfere with learning [J] . Human Factors, 2004, 46: 567-581.

[33] Moore, C. Do we really need narration? [N]. 2010: http://blog.cathy-moore.com/2010/09/do-we-really-need-narration Accessed: February 2019

[34] Sweller, J. Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture [J] . Instructional Science, 2004, 32: 9 – 31.

[35] Sweller, J. Original article: Working memory, long-term memory, and instructional design [J] . Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2015.

[36] Felder, R. M. & Silverman, L. K. Learning and teaching styles in engineering education [J] . Engineering Education, 1988, 78(7): 674.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2019 Sylvie Studente


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.